计算机与现代化 ›› 2022, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (04): 92-96.

• 模式识别 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于混合特征选择的脑电解码方法

  

  1. (桂林航天工业学院电子信息与自动化学院,广西桂林541004)
  • 出版日期:2022-05-07 发布日期:2022-05-07
  • 作者简介:莫云(1988—),女,广西桂林人,助教,硕士,研究方向:生物医学与智能仪器,E-mail: moyun@guat.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    广西自动检测技术与仪器重点实验室基金资助项目(YQ19209); 2020年广西高校中青年教师科研基础能力提升项目(2020KY21017); 桂林航天工业学院校级科研基金资助项目(XJ21KT27)

EEG Decoding Method Based on Hybrid Feature Selection

  1. (School of Electronic Information and Automation, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, Guilin 541004, China)
  • Online:2022-05-07 Published:2022-05-07

摘要: 运动想象脑电是一种多通道高维信号,特征选择可以降低特征维数,选择更具判别性的特征,从而有效提高脑电解码的性能。现有的特征选择方法主要包括过滤式、包裹式和嵌入式方法,这3类方法各有优缺点。为了综合利用各类方法的优势,提出2种混合特征选择方法。第1种方法,使用最小绝对值收缩和选择算子(LASSO)进行特征选择,得到LASSO模型的权重之后,再设定一系列权重阈值进行二次特征筛选。第2种方法,使用Fisher分数对特征进行评分,然后设定一系列权重阈值进行二次特征筛选。使用Fisher线性判别分析(FLDA)对2种方法选择的特征子集进行分类。在2组脑机接口(BCI)竞赛数据集和1组实验室自采集数据集上进行实验,最高平均分类准确率分别为77.47%、76.11%、71.30%。实验结果表明,所提出的方法其分类性能优于现有的特征选择方法,而且特征选择时间也具有较大优势。

关键词: 运动想象, 脑电, 特征选择

Abstract: Motor imagery electroencephalography (EEG) is a multi-channel and high-dimensional signal. Feature selection can reduce the feature dimension and select more discriminative features, thereby effectively improving the performance of EEG decoding. The existing feature selection methods mainly include filter, wrapper and embedded methods, these three methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. In order to comprehensively utilize the advantages of various methods, two hybrid feature selection methods are proposed in this paper. For the first method, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) is used for feature selection. After the weight of LASSO model is obtained, a series of weight thresholds are set for secondary feature selection. For the second method, the Fisher score is used to score the features, then a series of weight thresholds are set for secondary feature selection. The Fisher linear discriminant analysis (FLDA) is used to classify the feature subsets selected by the two methods. Experiments were conducted on two sets of brain-computer interface (BCI) competition data sets and a set of self-collected laboratory data sets, and the average classification accuracy rates were 77.47%, 76.11%, and 71.30%, respectively. The experimental results show that the classification performance of the proposed method is better than the existing feature selection methods, and the feature selection time also has a greater advantage.

Key words: motor imagery, EEG, feature selection