制度压力对云计算内化影响的实证研究

计算机与现代化

制度压力对云计算内化影响的实证研究

江苏科技大学经济管理学院，江苏镇江212003

收稿日期:2015-04-22 出版日期:2015-09-21 发布日期:2015-09-24
作者简介: 胡冬兰（1988-），女，广西南宁人，江苏科技大学经济管理学院硕士研究生，研究方向：云计算。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71331003，71101065)；江苏省2014年度普通高校研究生实践创新计划项目（144）

An Empirical Study of Institutional Pressures Impact on Cloud Computing Assimilation

School of Economics and Management, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212003, China

Received:2015-04-22 Online:2015-09-21 Published:2015-09-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于制度理论构建云计算内化的影响因素的理论模型，以中国376家已采纳了云计算技术的企业为研究对象，利用结构方程模型，对制度压力以及高层管理支持对企业云计算内化的影响进行实证研究。研究发现：模仿压力显著正向影响高层管理支持，通过高层管理支持间接地影响企业云计算内化，但对企业云计算内化没有直接影响；强制压力对云计算内化既没有直接影响也没有间接影响；规范压力不仅显著正向影响企业云计算内化，还会通过高层管理的支持间接影响企业云计算的内化。最后，本文在实证研究结果的基础上给出促进中国企业云计算内化的的管理启示和政策建议。

关键词: 制度压力, 高层管理支持, 云计算内化

Abstract: Based on institutional theory, this paper examines the links among institutional pressures, top management support and assimilation of cloud computing. Survey data from the 376 firms of China show that: Mimetic pressures positively affect top management support, which then positively affects top management support the assimilation of cloud computing, while does not have direct significant impact on cloud computing assimilation. Coercive pressures do not have direct or indirect significant impact on cloud computing assimilation. Normative pressures not only positively affect cloud computing assimilation without the mediation of top management support but also positively affect cloud computing assimilation with the mediation of top management support. We conclude by highlighting the managerial implications and suggestions.

Key words: institutional pressures, top management support, cloud computing assimilation

胡冬兰，王念新，贾昱，葛世伦. 制度压力对云计算内化影响的实证研究[J]. 计算机与现代化.

HU Dong-lan， WANG Nian-xin， JIA Yu， GE Shi-lun. An Empirical Study of Institutional Pressures Impact on Cloud Computing Assimilation[J]. Computer and Modernization.

参考文献

［1］ Messerschmidt C M, Hinz O. Explaining the adoption of grid computing: An integrated institutional theory and organizational capability approach［J］. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2013,22(2):137-156.
［2］ Kung LeeAnn, Cegielski C, Kung Hsiang-Jui. Environmental pressure on software as a service adoption: An integrated perspective［C］// AMCIS. 2013:1-9.
［3］ Liu Hefu, Ke Weiling, Wei Kwok Kee, et al. The role of institutional pressures and organizational culture in the firms intention to adopt internet-enabled supply chain management systems［J］. Journal of Operations Management, 2010,28(5):372-384.
［4］ Saya S, Pee L G, Kankanhalli A. The Impact of institutional influences on perceived technological characteristics and real options in cloud computing adoption［C］// International Conference on Information Systems. 2010:1-11.
［5］ Gosain S. Enterpriseinformation systems as objects and carriers of institutional forces: The new iron cage?［J］. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2004,5(4):151-182.
［6］ Liang Huigang, Nilesh S, Hu Qing, et al. Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management［J］. MIS Quarterly, 2007,31(1):59-87.
［7］ Dimaggio P, Powell J, Walter W. The iron cage revisited:Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields［J］. American Sociological Review, 1983,48(2):147-160.
［8］ Abrahamson E. Management fashion［J］. Academy of Management Review, 1996,21(1):254-285.
［9］ Low Chinyao, Chen Yahsueh, Wu Mingchang. Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption［J］. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2011,111(7):1006-1023.
［10］Oliveira T, Thomas M, Espadanal M. Assessing the determinants of cloud computing adoption: An analysis of the manufacturing and services sectors［J］. Information & Management, 2014,51:497-510.
［11］ Foster I, Zhao Yong, Raicu I, et al. Cloud computing and grid computing 360-degree compared［C］// Grid Computing Environments Workshop, 2008. GCE08.2008:1-10.
［12］Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw J. Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration［J］. British Journal of Management, 2006,17(4):263-282.
［13］Armstrong J, Overton T. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys［J］. Journal of Marketing Research, 1977,14(3):396-402.
［14］Podsakoff P, Mackenzie S, Lee J, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies［J］. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003,88(5):879-903.
［15］Podsakoff P, Organ D. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects［J］. Journal of Management, 1986,12(4):531-544.
［16］Baron, R, Kenny D. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations［J］. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986,51(6):1173-1182.